Food Quality: A Comparison of the Proximate Content & Sensory Properties of Some Composite Flour Meals

Main Article Content

Eridiong O. Onyenweaku
Patricia A. Ebai
Winifred A. Fila

Abstract

Aims: To compare the proximate composition and sensory properties of some composite flour mix meals. This is to show which combination has higher nutritional value and is more palatable for consumption.

Study Design: Experimental and observational.

Place and Duration of Study: University of Calabar, Calabar - Nigeria. July to September, 2019.

Methodology: The samples were purchased from the market, washed, dried, and milled under proper sanitary conditions. The flours were then formulated by weight (1:1) and thoroughly milled together giving 3 composite flour mixes of guinea corn-millet, unripe plantain-cabbage and corn-cassava flour. These were made into meals (pastes) by boiling in hot water using standard procedures. Proximate analysis was carried using standard AOAC methods while the sensory evaluation was done by 20 semi-trained panelists using a 9-point hedonic scale. Statistical analyses of results were carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences and significance was accepted at p< 0.05.

Results: Unripe plantain-cabbage flour mix had significantly higher content of protein, fat, ash, carbohydrate and consequently calories, while maize-cassava flour mix had the lowest content of fat and calories. The carbohydrate content of the 3 composite flours ranged from 24.23 to 27.45 KCal/100 g with guinea corn-millet flour mix having the least value. All 3 composite flour mixes were observed to be of good nutritional value.

Conclusion: Unripe plantain-cabbage flour mix and guinea corn-millet flour mix is recommended as a healthier alternative to excessively starchy swallows of low nutrient quality. Also, maize-cassava flour mix may be useful in the management of diabetes and obesity as it had lower caloric value and fat with good protein content and moderate carbohydrate. Generally, the 3 mixes had good acceptability, hence composite flour formulations made of indigenous foods should be encouraged since the combinations are not only palatable but of better nutrient quality than single flours.

Keywords:
Composite, flours, proximate, cereals, meals, quality, sensory

Article Details

How to Cite
Onyenweaku, E. O., Ebai, P. A., & Fila, W. A. (2020). Food Quality: A Comparison of the Proximate Content & Sensory Properties of Some Composite Flour Meals. Asian Food Science Journal, 16(2), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.9734/afsj/2020/v16i230170
Section
Original Research Article

References

Ezzati M, Hoorn SV, Rodgers A. Comparative risk assessment collaborating group estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major health risk factors. The Lancet. 2002;362(9380):271-280.

FAO. Combating micronutrient deficiencies: Food-based approaches. The food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Eds B. Thompson and L. Amoroso); 2013.

Onyenweaku EO, Ene-Obong HN, Oko GE, Williams IO. Contribution of eggs and other cholesterol-containing foods to total dietary cholesterol intake, and their influence on serum lipid profile of adults in Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety. 2019;9(4):329–340.

Leitzmann C. Food quality—definition and a holistic view. In: Sommer H, Petersen BV, Wittke P. (eds) Safeguarding Food Quality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1993.

Greenfield H, Southgate DAT. Food composition data production, management and use. 2nd Edition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome; 2003.

Piqueras-Fizman B, Spence C. Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality Preference. 2015; 40:165–79.

Stone H, Sidel JL. Sensory evaluation practices. Food Science and Technology, Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, CA; 1993.

IFT (Institute of food Technologists). Sensory evaluation methods. The Society for the Food Technologists, Chicago, IL; 2007

AOAC Official method of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists (15th ed.) Virginia; 2010.

Pearson D. The Chemical Analysis of Foods (7th Ed.) Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg, United Kingdom; 1976.

James CS. The Analytical Chemistry of Foods. Chapman and Hall Press. New York. 1995;86.

Iwe MO. Handbook of sensory methods and analysis. PROJOINT Communications Services Ltd, Enugu. 2002;70-72.

Oko AO, Eluu SC, Ugwu DO, Ehihia LU, Okorie JM, Ebem EC, Simeon AO. Proximate and Mineral Compositions of some Staple foods commonly consumed in Nigeria. Archives of Pharmacol Research. 2018;14(1):100-105.

Akinsanmi R, Luong VI, Kapran A. Mamadou F, Sagnard M, Deu D. Assessment of the nutritional, anti-nutritional and antioxidant capacity of unripe, ripe and over ripe plantain (Musa paradisiacal) peels. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2015;3(2): 63–72.

Okafor GI, Ugwu FC. Production and evaluation of cold extruded and baked ready-to eat snacks from blends of breadfruit (Treculia africana), cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale) and coconut (Cocos nucifera). Food Science Quality and Management. 2014;23:65-77.

Awuchi CG. Proximate composition and functional properties of different grain flour composites for industrial applications. International Journal of Food Sciences. 2019;2(1)4;43–64.

Oppong D, Arthur E, Kwadwo SO, Badu E, Sakyi P. Proximate composition and some functional properties of soft wheat flour. Int’l Journal of Innovative Research in Sci, Engineering and Technol. 2015;4(2):753-758.

Gibney MJ. Nutrition, diet and health. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press. 1989;168.

Tauferova A, Tremlova B, Bednar J, Golian J, Zidek R, Vietoris V. Determination of ketchup sensory texture acceptability and examination of determining factors as a basis for product optimization. International Journal of Food Properties. 2015;18(3):660-669.

Rafiyaz B, Waqas NB, Farooq AM, Fatih Y. Development and quality evaluation of hypoallergic complementary foods from rice incorporated with sprouted green gram flour (Reviewing Editor). Journal Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2016;2(1):34-45.

Sharif MK, Butt MS, Sharif HS, Nasir M. Sensory evaluation and consumers acceptability; 2017.

Assessed 18th Octcber, 2017

Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320466080

Retapol TN, Hooker H. Consumer evaluation and preference heterogeneity for a novel functional food. Journal of Food Science. 2006;71:41–46.