Variance of Arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) Starch Granule Morphology among Five Different Provinces in Sri Lanka
Asian Food Science Journal, Volume 21, Issue 11,
Arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) is an underutilized tuber crop in Sri Lanka that produces a gluten-free, easily digestible starch. This research aimed to determine the variance of arrowroot starch granular morphology among the plants grown in five different provinces (Western, North-Western, Southern, Sabaragamuwa, Uva). Arrowroot starch granules were observed using the light microscope and scanning electron microscope. Oval, irregular globular and spherical shapes were the predominant granule shapes for arrowroot. The mean percentage of oval shaped granules ranged between 48.46 % - 59.34 %. The length and width of the granules were not significantly different among the five provinces. The length of the starch granules ranged between 42.91 - 45.86 µm while the width ranged between 30.81 – 32.32 µm. Arrowroot flour samples from five different provinces in Sri Lanka were not significantly different with regard to the starch granular morphology and therefore, arrowroot flour can be utilized in the local food industry without concerning their geographical locations.
- granular shape
- granular morphology
- Maranta arundinacea
How to Cite
Vegh KR. Starch bearing crops as food sources. Cultivated Plants Primarily as Food Sources. 2002;1.
Qiang L. Chemistry, physical properties and applications, Food carbohydrates, (Steve W .Cui), CRC Press; 2005. ISBN:978-0-8-493-1574-9,
Souza DC, Silva RJ, Guerra TS, Silva LFL, Resende LV, Pereira J. Characterization of arrowroot starch in different agronomic managements. Rev. Ceres, Vicosa. 2019; 66(5):323-332.
Burrell MM. Starch: the need for improved quality and quantity – an overview. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2003;54:451-456.
Wijesinghe JAAC, Wickramasinghe I, Saranandha KH, Variance of Granular Morphology in Kithul (Caryota urens) Flour among Five Different Growing Areas in Sri Lanka, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IJMS). 2014;2(1):74-78.
Jane J. Current understanding on starch granule structures. J. Appl. Glycosci. 2006; 53:205-213.
Lentfer CJ, Therin M, Torrence R. Starch grains and environmenta reconstruction: a modern test case from west new Britain, Papua New Guinea. Archaeol. Sci. 2002;29:687-698.
Copeland L, Blazek J, Salman H, Tang MC. Form and functionality of starch. Food Hydrocolloids. 2009;23:1527-1534.
Jane J, Kasemsuwan T, Leas S, Zobel H, Robyt JF. Anthology of starch granule morphology by scanning electron microscopy. Starch/Starke. 1994;46:121-129.
Biliaderis CG. The structure and interaction of starch with food constituents. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1999;69:60- 78.
Svihus B, Uhlen AK, Harstad OM. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review, Elsevier; Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2005;122(306):303-320.
Adejomo A, Aderibigbe AF, Layokun SK. Cassava starch: Production, physicochemical properties and hydrolysation- a review. Advances in Food and Energy Security. 2011;2.
Franco CML, Ciacco CF. Factors that affect the enzymatic degradation of natural starch granules. Effect of the Size of the Granules. Starch/Starke. 1992;44:422- 426.
Campbell MR, Li J, Berke TG, Glover DV. Variation of starch granule size in tropical maize germ plasm. Cereal Chem. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. 1996;73(5):536-538.
Takeiti C, Fakhouri F, Ormenese R, Steel C, Collares F. Freeze-thaw stability of gels prepared from starches of non-conventional sources. Starch/Starke. 2007;59:156-160.
Nwokocha LM, Williams PA. Some properties of white and yellow plantain (Musa paradisiaca, normalis) starches. Carbohyd. Polym. 2009;76:133-138.
Jyoti PS, and Konwar BK. Physicochemical properties of starch from aroids of north east India. Int. J. Food Prop; 2011.
DOI: 10.1080/ 10942912.2010.491929.
Madineni NM, Sheema F, Ragu SS, Ramasamy R, Manisha G. Morphological, Structural, and functional properties of Maranta (Maranta arundinacea L) Starch. Food science and Biotechnology. 2012;21:747-752.
Moorthy SN. Physicochemical and functional properties of tropical tuber starches: A review. Starch/Starke, 2002; 54:559-592.
Nogueira GF, Fakhouri FM, Oliveira RA. Extraction and characterization of arrowroot (Maranta arundincea) starch and its application in edible films. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2018;186:64-72.
Villas-Baos F, Franco CML. Effect of bacterial β-amylase and fungal α-amylase on the digestability and structural characteristics of potato and arrowroot starches. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;52:795-803.
Hoover R. Composition, molecular structure, properties and modification of pulse starches: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2001;45(3):253-267.
Charles AL, Cato K, Huang TC, Chang YH, Ciou JY, Chang JS, et al. Functional properties of arrowroot starch in cassava and sweet potato composite starches. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016; 53:187-191.
Horovitz O, Cioica N, Jumate N, Pojar-Fenesan M, Balea A, Liteanu N, Mocanu A, Tomodia-Cotisel M. SEM Characterization of starch granules. Studia ubb Chemia. 2011;1:212-219.
Leonal M. Analise de forma e tamanho de granulos de amidos de diferentes fonts botanicas. Ciencia e Technologia de Alimentos. 2007;27:579-588.
Valencia GA, Moraes ICF, Lourenco RV, Habitante, Bittante AMQB, Sobral PJA. Physicochemical properties of Maranta (Maranta arundinacea L.) starch. International Journal of food Properties. 2014;18:1990-2001.
Erdman MD. Starch from Arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) grown at Tifon, Georgia, Cereal Chemistry. 1986; 63(39):277-279.
Peroni FHG, Rocha TS, Franco CML. Some structural and physicochemical charcteristics of tuber and root starches, Food. Sci. tech. Int. 2006;12(6):505- 513.
Wickramasinghe HAM, Takigawa S, Matsuura-Endo C, Yamauchi H, Noda T. Comparative analysis of starch properties of different root and tuber crops of Sri Lanka, Food Chemistry. 2009;112(1):98-103.
Lindeboom N, Chang PR, Tyler RT. Analytical, biochemical an physicochemical aspects of starch granule size, with emphasis on small granule starches: A review. Starch/Stärke. 2004; 56:89-99.
Singh N, Singh J, Kaur L, Sodhi NS, Gill BS. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches from different botanical sources. Food Chemistry. 2003;81:219-231.
Perez E, Larez M, Gonzalez Z. Some characteristics of sagu (Canna edulis) and zulu (Maranta sp) rhizomes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1997;45:2546-2549.
Singh J, Dartois A, Kaur L. Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2010;21:168–180.
Asare EK, Jaiswal S, Maley J, Båga M, Sammynaiken R, Rossnagel BG, Chibbar RN. Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:4743–4754.
Tester RF, Karkalas J, Qi X. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci. 2004;39:151–165.
Zabolotets A, Litvyak V, Yermakou A, Ospankulova G. Morphological characteristics of starch granules of Eastern and Central European potato varieties (Solanum Tuberosum). Food Technology. 2018;8(1):18- 33.
Abstract View: 233 times
PDF Download: 73 times